Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a global score of 84.2 against 71.5. IPhone XS's body is somewhat thinner and lighter than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a better looking display than iPhone XS, because it has a larger display, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a little better pixel count in each inch of display and way more brightness.
The iPhone XS features a much more powerful processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a very superior camera than iPhone XS, because it has a way larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures, a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher video resolution and a camera with a way better resolution. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a way better battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 2659mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.