Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Blue and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.4 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 has a global score of 81.1, which is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 general score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Nexus 6 has older 5.1 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14. The Google Nexus 6 design is lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it is thicker and was released many years before.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a sharper display than Google Nexus 6, because it has a quite larger screen, a little bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a just a bit greater pixels density. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Google Nexus 6 counts with a much greater performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has 4 less processing cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures greater pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with a lot better 50 megapixels resolution.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a way better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 58 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.