Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Gray and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, with a score of 80.2 against 71.5. The Google Pixel is a much lighter phone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but they have the same thickness. Google Pixel counts with a very superior CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM memory.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much better looking display than Google Pixel, because it has a lot bigger screen, a just a bit higher number of pixels in each inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel, because it has a way bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs, a camera with a much higher resolution, a larger camera aperture for better photos in low light environments and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.