Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a global score of 80 against 71.5. Google Pixel 3's construction is a little bit thinner and noticeably lighter than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it was released many years before. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a lot better screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a bigger display and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a way better processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a superior storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3, because it has a larger aperture for better photos in low light situations, a way higher video resolution, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photos and videos and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 75% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.