Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a score of 80.7, which is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 global score. Google Pixel 3 XL's construction is just a bit thinner and lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, even though it was released 5 years before. Google Pixel 3 XL has a much more powerful processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a brighter display than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little bit bigger display. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a much more MP back facing camera, a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos, a lot better video definition and a bigger aperture.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 49% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.