Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a has a global score of 78.8, which is better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's score of 71.5. Google Pixel 3a is an much older device than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but Google was able to make it way lighter and a bit thinner anyway. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a has older 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a just a little better pixel number per inch of screen, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bigger display. Google Pixel 3a features a much more powerful processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a way larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and videos, a way more megapixels camera in the back and a lot better video resolution.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 70 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.