Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a global score of 78.9 against 71.5. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14. The Google Pixel 3a XL is an extremely older cellphone than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it's lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a better display pixels density and a quite bigger screen. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much greater storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a XL has an extremely better CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5100mAh battery size instead of 3700mAh. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video, a way better video definition and a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.