Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a score of 81.9, which is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's global score of 71.5. Google Pixel 4 is an a lot older device than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but Google was able to build it a little bit thinner and much lighter. Google Pixel 4 has a much faster CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a little higher display pixels density. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a lot more MP back-facing camera, a much bigger sensor and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has an 82 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.