Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having a score of 82.9 against 71.5. Even though Google Pixel 4 XL is notably older than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's construction is just a bit thinner and just a little lighter. Google Pixel 4 XL features a much better processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a quite lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a bit larger screen. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much better camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs, a much more mega pixels camera in the back and a way better video quality.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 38% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.