Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting an 82.9 score against 71.5. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has 11 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version. Although the Google Pixel 4a is older than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's construction is lighter and just a little bit thinner.
Google Pixel 4a counts with a way better performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a just a bit higher pixel number per screen inch, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a larger display.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a lot better resolution camera, a way larger sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a way better video definition.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 3140mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.