Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 score. Google Pixel 4a 5G is an older device than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter and a little thinner anyway. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a much better performing processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a little more pixels per inch in the display and a bit larger display.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a way higher 50 megapixels resolution camera, a way bigger camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a lot higher video quality.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.