Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 is a lot better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having an 89 score against 71.5. Google Pixel 5 is an noticeably older phone than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it is notably lighter and a bit thinner anyway. The Google Pixel 5 features a really superior hardware performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much sharper display than Google Pixel 5, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution, a bit larger screen and a just a little greater display pixels density. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality pictures, a lot better video definition and a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.