Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 516 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is slightly better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having a score of 77.6 against 71.5. HTC U11's body is a little thinner and lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 7 years before. The HTC U11 counts with an extremely better processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a more vivid display than HTC U11, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3200. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures greater photos and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a camera in the back with way more MP and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a way bigger memory for games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much longer battery life than HTC U11, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.