Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ has a general score of 81.2, which is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's global score of 71.5. Despite of the fact that LG V40 ThinQ is way older than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. These phones include Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version.
LG V40 ThinQ features a very superior CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a just a little worse pixel quantity in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes way better pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with lot more MP. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a better storage for apps and games than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much longer battery duration than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.