Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Microsoft |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Glacier and Obsidian |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having a overall score of 85.3 against 71.5. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has an older 11 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version. Despite of the fact Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a lot older and a lot heavier than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's body is still much thinner.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a way better performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of display and much more brightness.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a very superior camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a camera with a lot better resolution and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a very superior memory for apps and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a bit superior battery performance than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity instead of 4449mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.