Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is a lot better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having a overall score of 89.6 against 71.5. The Motorola edge construction is a little bit lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it is a bit thicker and was released many years before. These phones have Android OS, but Motorola edge has 10 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version.
The Motorola edge counts with an extremely better processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much sharper display than Motorola edge, because it has a higher screen pixel density, a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Motorola edge, because although it has a much worse 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Motorola edge features a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola edge also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola edge, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.