Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's global score of 71.5. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 20 Lite has 11 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite construction is a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, even though it was released many years before.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a lot better display than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because it has a higher pixels density, a bit larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Motorola Edge 20 Lite has slightly more memory to install games and applications than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a really superior performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 20 Lite shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also counts with faster 120 fps video frame rates and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.