Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.3 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is way better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction has the same thickness than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it's just a little lighter. These devices come with the same Android 14 OS, so both of them should provide you very similar OS features.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a higher display pixels density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a little larger display and a little brighter display. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more memory capacity for apps and games than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because it has more internal storage. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a bit better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have a 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a same size sensor, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also counts with a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.