Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is a lot better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having an 86.2 score against 71.5. Moto G200 5G's body is a little lighter than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it's just a little bit thicker and was released 2 years before. Both phones in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G200 5G has older 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a way better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a better pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The Moto G200 5G has a much faster processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography in low light situations.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a little better battery life than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.