Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is just a bit better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, with a score of 78.5 against 71.5. Motorola One Action is a much older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but Motorola managed to build it lighter anyway. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola One Action, because it has a bit bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola One Action counts with a really superior performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola One Action has a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, because it has a lot better video quality, a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and videos. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a very superior battery life than Motorola One Action, because it has a 46% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.