Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a 79.8 score against 71.5. Motorola One Hyper's design is just a little bit lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it is a bit thicker and was released 4 years before. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Motorola One Hyper has 11 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a way better display than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a better screen density and a little bigger display. The Motorola One Hyper features more memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper has a much more powerful CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 5100mAh battery size. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a better camera than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited environments and a way better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.