Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has a score of 87, which is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's score of 71.5. Motorola razr (2020)'s body is just a little thinner and a bit lighter than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both devices in this comparison come with Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a better screen pixel density, a bit bigger display and a way higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro and the Motorola razr (2020) count with incredibly similar memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have the same internal memory capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much faster processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a camera in the back with a better 50 MP resolution and a way bigger sensor.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.