Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Meteor grey |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a global score of 80.3, which is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's overall score of 71.5. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but Nokia 8 V 5G UW has the previous 10 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14. Although it's the best in this comparison review, Nokia 8 V 5G UW's construction is way older, just a little thicker and just a little heavier than vivo iQOO 12 Pro.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a lot better display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a display of the same size, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a little bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a very superior performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs, a much better video definition and a bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a little better battery life than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has a 5100mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.