Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, with an 80.8 score against 71.5. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Nokia XR20 is a noticeably older, thicker and noticeably heavier device than vivo iQOO 12 Pro. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Nokia XR20 has an older 11 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
The Nokia XR20 features a very superior processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a lot better looking screen than Nokia XR20, because it has a bit larger screen, way more screen brightness, a higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better camera than Nokia XR20, because it has a way larger sensor providing a much better image quality, a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures in low light situations, a much higher video resolution and a better 50 MP resolution camera. The Nokia XR20 has a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has just a bit longer battery performance than Nokia XR20, because it has a 10% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.