Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Sonic silver |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S is a bit better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having a 76.2 score against 71.5. The nubia Red Magic 5S is a way older, thicker and just a bit heavier device than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro. These devices work with Android operating system, but the nubia Red Magic 5S has the older 10 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a lot better processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much sharper display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a higher display pixels density, way more brightness, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a bit bigger screen.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a little longer battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a way bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.