Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A30 is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having a 79.6 score against 71.5. The Galaxy A30 design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, even though it was released 5 years before. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a better display density, a little bit larger screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A30 features a very superior processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A30, and although they both have a same size aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.