Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 is better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having a general score of 81.3 against 71.5. The Galaxy A31 body has the same thickness than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it's just a little bit lighter. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A31 has 10 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a little bit bigger display, a higher screen density and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a much better performing processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a camera with a better resolution, a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video, a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A31, because it has a 5100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.