Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 general score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is somewhat lighter and thinner than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, even though it was released many years before. Galaxy A50 counts with a very superior hardware performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a little larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and more pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit bigger memory to install games and applications than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a much higher video quality, a lot larger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos and a camera with much more megapixels.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.