Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is way better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having an 86.6 score against 71.5. Samsung Galaxy A50s's construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. These devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has 10 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
The Galaxy A50s has a much better performing processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a lot better display than Galaxy A50s, because it has more pixels per inch in the screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a bit bigger screen.
Galaxy A50s has just a bit bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light captures and a back facing camera with more mega-pixels.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.