Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is a lot better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a overall score of 90.8 against 71.5. The Galaxy A51 5G design has the same thickness than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it is just a bit lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a much better performing processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a lot better screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a better pixel density, a bit larger screen and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video, a back camera with a higher resolution and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.