Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is a lot better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, with a general score of 90.7 against 71.5. Galaxy A52 is an way older phone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it's a little bit lighter and a little thinner anyway. The Galaxy A52 has a much more powerful CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way better display than Galaxy A52, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a quite bigger display and a better display density. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A52, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger camera aperture and a way larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
The Galaxy A52 has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.