Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has an overall score of 91.3, which is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's overall score of 71.5. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is way older than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's design is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way better looking display than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a better pixel density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy A52 5G has a much better performing CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photos, a bigger camera aperture and a much better video quality.
The Galaxy A52 5G features more storage for applications and games than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 13% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.