Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a global score of 91.1, which is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 general score. Even though Samsung Galaxy A52s is notably older than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's construction is just a little bit thinner and a bit lighter. Both devices we are comparing here use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s has the older 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version.
Galaxy A52s counts with a very superior processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much better screen than Galaxy A52s, because it has more pixels per display inch, a little bit larger screen and a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1 TB. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a camera with a much worse 50 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations, a lot larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 5100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.