Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A6 is just a bit better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a global score of 75.8 against 71.5. The Galaxy A6 is an much older phone than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it's thinner and lighter anyway. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a much greater amount of pixels per inch of display and a bigger display.
Galaxy A6 has a much better performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a lot larger sensor capturing much higher quality photos, a much higher video definition and a back camera with a way better resolution. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.