Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is just a bit better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 score. Even though Galaxy A70 is incredibly older than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's body is just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
The Galaxy A70 features an extremely better CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A70, because it has a higher pixels quantity per screen inch, a quite larger display and a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a lot better 7680x4320 video definition and a way bigger sensor. The Galaxy A70 features slightly more storage for games and applications than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A70, because it has a 13 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.