Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, with a overall score of 85.2 against 71.5. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy F41 has the previous 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14. Galaxy F41's construction is a little lighter than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it's just a little thicker and was released 3 years before.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better screen than Galaxy F41, because it has a lot brighter screen, a little bit larger screen, a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a better memory for games and applications than Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy F41 has a really superior processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy F41, because although it has a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.