Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 516 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is a lot better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 global score. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M51 has older 10 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version. The Galaxy M51 construction is older, just a little heavier and a bit thicker than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy M51, because it has a higher screen density, a quite bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The Galaxy M51 has just a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy M51 has a much more powerful CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a lot worse 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera aperture, a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy M51 features a way better battery lifetime than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 5100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.