Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is way better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's general score of 71.5. Galaxy Note 20's construction is a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a better display pixel density, a quite bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has more internal memory. Galaxy Note 20 has an extremely better processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same video quality, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a lot larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture for better captures in low light environments, higher 30 frames per second video frame rate and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.