Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 score. Even though Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot older and just a little heavier than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's construction is still a little bit thinner. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a quite greater screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes a little bit better photographs and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing lower quality pictures, worse video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing pictures and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a camera with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.