Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has a global score of 79.3, which is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a lot older than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's construction is lighter and thinner. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has the previous 5.1 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
Galaxy Note 5 features a much powerful CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although faster). The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a little bit better pixel amount in each display inch, a bigger screen and a bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more internal storage capacity. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and videos and a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.