Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.76 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, having a general score of 80.4 against 71.5. Although Galaxy Note Fan Edition is much older than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's body is a bit thinner and lighter. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a just a little more pixels per inch of display, a slightly higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a lot better performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a way better video definition, a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 59% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.