Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's global score of 71.5. The Galaxy Note10 body is lighter and just a bit thinner than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, even though it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a very superior hardware performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a bit larger screen, a better pixel amount in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos, a back camera with lot more mega pixels and a lot higher video definition.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro and Galaxy Note10 feature incredibly similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have the same internal memory. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.