Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is way better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting an 86.2 score against 71.5. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a just a little lighter phone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but both of them have the same thickness. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has older 11 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a way better hardware performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a bit bigger display and a better screen pixel density.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a back facing camera with a way higher resolution, a lot higher video quality and a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features a better memory capacity for apps and games than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.