Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note5 has a global score of 80.2, which is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's global score of 71.5. The Galaxy Note5 is an incredibly older phone than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a much powerful CPU than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a lot better display than Galaxy Note5, because it has a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a little higher amount of pixels in each inch in the screen and a larger screen. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a much better video quality, a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos, a larger aperture and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 5100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.