Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is a lot better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's global score of 71.5. Even though the Galaxy S10 Lite is older than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, it's construction is a bit thinner and a little lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with an extremely better processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a greater screen pixel density, a little bigger display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a bigger aperture for better captures and videos in low light situations, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality pictures and videos, a way better video definition and a better 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a better memory capacity for games and applications than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro features a little better battery duration than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.