Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2023-11-14 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is a lot better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy S10e's body is a lot lighter and just a little thinner than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 5 years before. Galaxy S10e features an extremely better processor than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy S10e, because it has a little more pixels per display inch, a bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photos or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way more mega pixels back camera, a lot bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.