Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro's score of 71.5. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has 11 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is an noticeably older phone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, but it is a bit thinner and just a bit lighter anyway.
Galaxy S20 FE has a much powerful processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a greater display pixels density, a little bit bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Galaxy S20 FE has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 13% more battery size.
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low-light situations, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and videos, a way more mega pixels back camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.