Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is way better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a 98 score against 71.5. Despite being the best we compare here, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a noticeably older, a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker phone than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the older 13 version and vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14 version.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a better looking display than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 3200px, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a really superior processing power than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with more memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G takes just a bit better photographs and videos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has a lot tinier camera sensor capturing way lower quality videos and pictures, a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and lower 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because it has a 5100mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.