Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 10.4 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 is much better than the vivo iQOO 12 Pro, getting a 93.4 score against 71.5. Galaxy S22's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it was released a little bit more than a year before. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S22 has an older 13 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a bit better screen than Galaxy S22, because it has much more brightness, a little bit better pixels density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a quite larger screen. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S22 counts with a much greater hardware performance than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S22, because it has a 38 percent larger battery size. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same video definition and a 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a larger sensor and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.