Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2023-11-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.48 x 2.97 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.4 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 750 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.76 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5100mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is way better than vivo iQOO 12 Pro's 71.5 overall score. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra design is older, somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than vivo iQOO 12 Pro. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version while vivo iQOO 12 Pro has Android 14.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much powerful processing unit than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro also has a little greater pixel density, a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a much brighter display.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures slightly better videos and photos than vivo iQOO 12 Pro, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality photos and videos, a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and slower 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a camera with a much better 108 megapixels resolution.
Vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The vivo iQOO 12 Pro counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 5100mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.